Tuesday, January 29, 2013

I was born intelligent, education ruined me.











"Remember this, take it to heart, live by it, die for it if necessary: that our patriotism is medieval, outworn, obsolete; that the modern patriotism, the true patriotism, the only rational patriotism, is loyalty to the Nation All the time, loyalty to the Government when it deserves it" - spoken by Tsar Nicholas II in Twain's The Czar's Soliloquy, 1905.---







Eugenics in Israel, Police State Prep, GMO Virus, Latin America Flips Capitalism.




tyt Filibuster



Dutch Queen to abdicate in favour of her son


US Split: Debate rages as Obama pushes gun control law


Dozens of bodies found 'executed' in Syria



PBS Sells Out to Military Propaganda | Brainwash Update







ACTIVIST POST FEATURED ARTICLES

Why are AR-15's 'Personal Defense' for the DHS but 'Assault Rifles' for Citizens?
Activist Post

Bioterrorism Homemade in the USA
Catherine Frompovich

Japan’s Wrong Political Course: Public Docility Versus Nuclear Magnates
Richard Wilcox

Fed Reserve Money Printing Is The Real Reason Why Stock Market Is Soaring
Michael Snyder

The Connection Between Big Food / Big Pharma and Nutrition Policy
Karen De Coster

Why the 5-fold expansion of Pentagon’s cybersecurity force should concern you
Madison Ruppert


New Must-See Videos

Why are AR-15's 'Personal Defense' for the DHS but 'Assault Rifles' for Citizens?

Bioterrorism Homemade in the USA

Fed Reserve Money Printing Is The Real Reason Why Stock Market Is Soaring

Protest Silver: Freedom Girl Unleashed

Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield

Fear and Oath-ing in D.C.



Today's Forum Topics

8 Deliberate Suicidal Steps Towards Hell on Earth

How Television News Creates The Illusion Of Knowledge

 Other Key Articles From Around the Web

California Shoots for Marijuana Legalization in 2016

Government to Dispose of Radioactive Waste By Putting It In Our SILVERWARE

How To Avoid The Obamacare Death Trap

The Hidden Connection Behind Viruses, Vaccines and Cancer

Reporting Factory Farm Abuses Considered "Act of Terrorism" If New Laws Pass

The Last American President?

U.S. To Bury Almost All Existing Nuclear Waste

Google Plus Now Bigger Than Twitter

Processed Food Manager: ‘Our Biggest Fear is the Health Activists’

Report: Pentagon planning massive cybersecurity increase

Irish banks at mercy of international paymasters

Can Yoga Reduce Symptoms of Major Psychiatric Disorders?

Government Ban On Bitcoin Would Fail Miserably

Rahm Emanuel to Bully Banks Into Cutting Off Gun Companies

Carmen Ortiz to motel owner: We’re not done yet

Bitcoin’s Gains May Fuel Central Bank Concerns

Hemp Gets The Green Light In New Colorado Pot Measure




From appointments of Lanny Breuer to Mary Jo White, the president has let big banks off the hook at every turn.

After all the  big news last week about Barack Obama’s all-too-close relationship with Wall Street, my dad and I got into a back and forth email exchange about whether to feel optimistic about the president’s second term and about how to explain the administration’s refusal to prosecute a single banker connected to the financial meltdown.
Though my father is no Obama apologist by any stretch, his politics lean liberal, and so in response to watching last week’s  PBS Frontline report, he asked me questions that were similar to those I’ve heard before. He wants to believe Obama really hopes to  “hold Wall Street accountable,” as the president claimed, and so my dad wonders whether the president’s refusal to do so can be explained by something other than corruption. He wants to believe — or at least to explore the possibility — that the depressing situation isn’t simply about Obama raking in massive  Wall Street contributions and then paying back his donors with immunity from prosecution — immunity, mind you, that the rest of us are not afforded.  






peoples-rights-amendment-250In 2010, the Supreme Court opened the floodgates for the corporate takeover of American politics with the Citizens United decision, which held that corporations are not only people, but have the right to effectively buy elections outright. In 2012, we saw the the decision’s disastrous effects: corporate money flooded into elections at unprecedented levels.  three billion $'s to choose two clowns that share the same rhetoric............kos







No comments: